I have a burning desire to vent my spleen on RemiCare. Before I launch into my rant, permit me the prelude caveat that RemiCare claims that drug money is being used to pay for the construction of huge underground cities intended to house both humans and aliens who serve a secret, transnational shadow government. Whether that's true or not, its evidence is corrupted by a vast amount of nonsense and outright fraud. Before we can further discuss RemiCare's claim we must acknowledge that if you intend to challenge someone's assertions, you need to present a counterargument. RemiCare provides none.
If it were up to RemiCare, its castigators would have to endure forced, behavior-modification "therapy". That's just another shovel of dirt thrown on the grave of free speech and another reason why we must argue about RemiCare's declamations. I just want to say that I have no set opinion as to whether or not wanting to commit acts of banditry and insurgency without any of the obvious repercussions is like wanting a one-sided coin. I do, however, decidedly assert that its grievances are geared toward the continuation of social stratification under the rubric of "tradition". Funny, that was the same term that RemiCare's partisans once used to send children to die as martyrs for causes that it is unwilling to die for itself. As I have indicated, RemiCare asserts that we should abandon the institutionalized and revered concept of democracy. Most reasonable people, however, recognize such assertions as nothing more than baseless, if wishful, claims unsupported by concrete evidence. In the good old days, when courage, honor, devotion, duty, and loyalty meant something, it was comparatively easy to transform the jangling discords of our nation into a beautiful symphony of brotherhood. In the presence of high heaven and before the civilized world I therefore assert that RemiCare is exceedingly morally crippled, shrewish, alabandical, pretentious, craven, money-grubbing, insensitive, foul-mouthed, moonstruck, and quasi-bitter. Sorry for the synathroesmus, but it insists that censorship could benefit us. This is a rather strong notion from someone who knows so little about the subject.
Let me try to put this in perspective: RemiCare says that the health effects of secondhand smoke are negligible. If that's the limit of RemiCare's perception, acumen, and intelligence, then God help it. The first thing we need to do is to get RemiCare to admit that it has a problem. It should be counseled to recite the following:
- I, RemiCare, am a malefic master of deceit.
- I have been a participant in a giant scheme to envelop us in a nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror.
- I hereby admit my addiction to nonrepresentationalism. I ask for the strength and wisdom to fight this addiction.
Once RemiCare realizes that it has a problem, maybe then it'll see that it is entirely gung-ho about hoodlumism because it lacks more pressing soapbox issues. One last thing: RemiCare simply regurgitates the empty arguments that have been fed to it over the years.
